Estimating

The Real Reason 38% of Electrical Bids Lose Money on Labor

NECA's 2025 Labor Unit Study ran the numbers across 1,700 contractors and 14,000 projects. The finding: 38% of lost-money electrical bids could be traced to labor underestimation that originated in the takeoff, not in field execution.

Jordan Whitmore Head of Product, PILRS
March 11, 2026 9 min read

That is the kind of number that gets quoted on LinkedIn but rarely unpacked. The underlying cause is not that estimators pick the wrong labor unit out of the NECA Manual of Labor Units. It is that they pick the right base unit and then fail to apply three specific adjustments that the MLU prescribes.

The three adjustments that make or break a bid

1. Ceiling height above 10 feet

The NECA MLU base labor unit for installing a 4" square box with cover, conduit, and device assumes a standard 8-10' ceiling. When the ceiling goes above 10', the MLU prescribes additive factors that most estimators either don't know exist or apply inconsistently.

At 12-14' AFF (typical for warehouse/big-box), add 15%. At 14-20', add 25%. Above 20', add 40% and start thinking about whether you need lift equipment in the bid, which is a separate line item entirely. On a 90k SF warehouse with 300+ receptacles and 400 lighting devices at 22' AFF, forgetting this single adjustment costs you roughly 280 labor hours — at a blended rate of $85/hr, that is $23,800 walking out of your bid and right into the "lost money" column.

2. Concealed installation

Running EMT exposed in a parking garage is one labor unit. Running the same EMT above a gyp ceiling is another. Running it in a wall cavity through unit framing on a multifamily project is a third. The MLU has "concealed" multipliers for these.

The trap: junior estimators use the base unit because they don't realize the job is mostly concealed. On a 300-unit multifamily project where 70% of the rough-in is in-wall, the concealed multiplier (typically 1.15x) applied across thousands of feet of conduit is not a rounding error. It is the margin on the job.

3. Congested or accessible area

The MLU has factors for "congested" installations — areas with other trades stacked, cramped mechanical rooms, interstitial spaces above hospital surgical suites. On the opposite end, truly open installations (warehouse, parking garage before other trades) can earn a favorable adjustment.

This one is the most subjective and the most often skipped. But on a renovation over occupied space (a common scenario), the congestion factor of 1.3x on ceiling rough-in is the difference between a profitable job and one that slips a month.

Why estimators skip them

Time pressure, mostly. You have 72 hours to turn around a bid, you run the takeoff, you apply the base MLU, and you add a 10% contingency at the end and call it done. The contingency is supposed to cover the adjustments. It never does, because the adjustments are not uniformly distributed — they are concentrated on a few specific scope categories, and 10% across the whole bid undercounts the parts that really need 25%.

"We lost $62,000 on a warehouse fit-out because I didn't catch that 22-foot ceiling adjustment. That was the last job I did without running every assembly through an MLU adjustment check."

Carlos Mendoza, Senior Electrical Estimator, Pacific Electrical Contractors — San Jose, CA

What automation actually solves

The reason AI takeoff tools have a disproportionate impact on labor accuracy is not because they know NECA MLU better than a senior estimator. A senior estimator knows MLU fine. It is because they apply it consistently. When the AI reads a plan and identifies a receptacle at 18' AFF in a concealed ceiling, it applies the 1.25x height factor and the 1.15x concealment factor automatically. A human estimator, doing the 847th device of the day at 4:45pm on a Friday, does not.

The practical checklist for your next bid

  1. Before you start the takeoff, write down the highest ceiling in the building. If it's above 10', commit to applying ceiling adjustments by room or area.
  2. Ask: what percentage of rough-in is concealed? If you can't answer within 10%, your bid is guessing.
  3. Walk the site on Google Street View and the plans together. Look for congestion clues: tight mechanical rooms, surgical suites, server rooms, cramped renovations.
  4. Apply MLU adjustments at the assembly level, not as a flat contingency.
  5. Peer review: have another estimator spot-check your MLU factors on the top five cost categories. Thirty minutes of peer review has saved six-figure mistakes.

The 10% contingency is not protecting you

The specific form this lesson usually takes: a contractor loses money on a bid, does the post-mortem, and finds the 10% general contingency was eaten by missed MLU adjustments in one scope category. The fix is not a bigger contingency. It is surgical application of MLU adjustments where they actually apply. The tools — AI or not — are there to make that surgical application happen at every one of your 800 device assemblies, not just the ones you happened to remember.

Key Takeaways

What to carry into your next bid

  1. 38% of lost-money bids trace to labor unit underestimation — not material
  2. Three adjustments matter: ceiling height above 10', concealed installation, and congestion
  3. A single missed 22-ft ceiling factor on 680 devices = ~280 labor hours missed (~$23k at blended rate)
  4. Flat 10% contingencies do not protect against MLU adjustments — they need to be applied surgically
  5. AI automation wins here because it applies adjustments consistently, not because it knows MLU better

Stop counting. Start reviewing.

PILRS turns the takeoff into a review step. See it on a real plan set from your next bid — free, no credit card.

Talk to Our Team